Conservative radio host and author, Dennis Prager says, “The left destroys everything it touches.” I must agree with him.
The left finds fault with everything and unscrupulously sets out to change it. This usually requires a new government program. Growing government ever larger, consuming more tax dollars, increasing regulations, and making it harder for Americans to prosper.
Often it involves changing the culture itself, and seldom is it changed in a good way.
Yet, it is the left's inconsistency and hypocrisy that makes me believe it is all a game with them. The ruling class doesn’t really believe what they are saying, they just want to exercise control over us.
They tell us that climate change® is an existential threat to humanity. It will make sea levels rise and decimate coastal cities. We simply must stop releasing CO2 into the atmosphere.
This is not true, and the ruling class doesn’t truly believe it. If they did, the multimillionaire ruling class would not buy huge oceanfront mansions and fly their private jets around the world spewing CO2 into the atmosphere. They just use that ruse to gain power by making us fearful.
CA was shut down as hard as any state during the Covid 19 plandemic. One brave man in Malibu, CA wanted to go paddle boarding and was promptly arrested for violating Gavin Newsom’s stay-at-home lockdown order.
Did Nancy Pelosi’s nephew, Governor Gavin Newsom really think it was dangerous to be in a crowd maskless? Not on your life, for he was later seen with 10 others at an expensive restaurant, without masking or social distancing living the good life. It was fine for the ruling class, but for you and me, shut up peasant.
For 3 years the left shouted, “Follow the science” regarding the Covid 19 plandemic. Dr. Robert Malone called it a mass formation psychosis, but I just call it a deep-state psychological operation (psyop).
Nevertheless, follow the science became, to them, the death blow to those who would disagree. When they used that “magic phrase,” everyone else was supposed to genuflect to the gods of science. Those 3 little words ended any discussion, and we were supposed to all fall in line behind them. Anyone who disagreed was called a “denier” and cast out of polite society.
OK, I have devoted enough time to that, and that is not where I wanted to go today anyway. Have you noticed how they were all about following the science when it suited them, but then the transgender delusion reared its ugly head? Suddenly, we were no longer supposed to follow the science, the settled science, saying there are only 2 sexes, male and female. Oh no! Now, the leftists wanted us to use the term “gender” instead of sex.
This is a tactic the left frequently uses, and it is a tactic conservatives must be aware of to defeat them. When the left can’t win on the facts, they change the language, they change the vocabulary.
To the left, this is merely a tactic to find common ground, to get good-hearted conservatives to compromise. The left can’t debate with facts because the X and Y chromosomes are unyielding. X and Y chromosomes live in the real world with you and me as males and females.
However, the leftists live in the make-believe world of the philosophy of Hegel, in which reality can be anything they want it to be. The leftists want to live in a world of feelings and self-expression.
This is the world in which most logic-based; real-world conservatives don’t live. The left wants to use the erudite, intellectual, philosophical language that serves to cloud rather than clarify the issue.
We suddenly discover we’re not talking about the same thing at all. We’re not debating about the term sex but about the term gender. You and I may see these 2 words as synonymous, but not to the left. Then if we are not careful, we will proclaim with them that there are multiple genders.
Patriots must not be confused by the left, and we must not use their language. Jesus said, “Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32
If we allow the left to set the parameters of the debate, we see how quickly we begin to lose. A Google search of the phrase, “How many genders are there” returned over 2.5 billion hits. It seems everyone wants to have a hand in determining the answer to that question. As I scrolled down the page, I saw answers ranging from 20 to 112 different genders. Their name is legion.
Do we have to wonder why our children are confused? When I was in high school, I didn’t know anyone who had trouble identifying a girl or boy. That part all seemed easy to me.
I do remember how awkward it was to ask for a date. I can’t imagine how much more difficult it would be today to be forced to do a psychological interrogation on a prospective date before asking her out. Boy, life was easy in the ’60s. Everything the left touches, it destroys.
Last week I heard a brief news story, and I almost missed it. You know how it goes. The news is on in the background, and suddenly you are jolted back into awareness and say, “What did they say.”
What I heard them say was that the American Medical Association (AMA) was studying a plan to transplant a uterus into trans men (or would that be a trans woman?) so the man could give birth. The goal was to alleviate any psychological dissonance experienced by the trans person (I give up, you pick a sex). They also discussed having insurance (you and me) and/or the government (you and me) pick up the $300,000 tab.
You can read an understandable piece about this here on Hot Air, and a somewhat less understandable piece at the AMA Journal of Ethics which is the original publisher of the piece.
In fairness to the AMA, they rebutted Hot Air’s piece, saying, “The viewpoints expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the AMA.”
That is fair enough, but why would reasonable people think like this, and if the idea had no support from the AMA, why was it published? Despite the well-deserved backlash the AMA will get from this, this topic is now in the public’s consciousness, or we could say the Overton Window has expanded to hold this as a possibility.
I am not a medical doctor, but I am a father. Fathers can easily observe the visible changes that take place as their wife carries their child. The woman is even more aware that every system in her body is altered to support God’s plan for the healthy development of a child.
If it were possible to transplant a uterus into a man, then implant an embryo into the uterine wall, and allow the embryo to grow to maturity, the rest of the hormonal and other changes a woman experiences during pregnancy would be missing. How would that affect the child?
What kind of Frankenstein child would this produce? Experiments of this nature were carried out by Josef Mengele in the Nazi death camps, does the AMA endorse them?
Surely, they would not, but wait. The AMA endorses the mutilation of our children. They support the castration of young boys, breast removal of young girls, and the giving of puberty blockers to innocent children—all for the sake of a few bucks and the approval of the trans lobby.
The AMA was once a well-respected organization, but no more. The left destroys everything it touches.
Wake up America and put a stop to this. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. This experimentation on our children is Satanic. It is our job to protect the children who depend on rational adults to make good decisions for them.
If we allow this child abuse to continue in America, all of America will suffer the consequences. Matthew 18:6—Mark 9:42—Luke 17:2
He who offends one of these, my children, let a millstone be tied about his neck and let him be thrown into the deepest sea. I'll be the first to give them a shove.